The Constitutional & Political Consequences for Britain if She Joins the Euro

 

The Constitutional Consequences

The Political Consequences

 

 

 

THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES

The Treaty on European Union that created European Monetary Union and the euro lays down massive and irreversible transfers of power from democratically elected national governments to unelected and unaccountable institutions like the European Commission and the European Central Bank.  Any country that joins EMU and adopts the euro has completely severed the link between the electorate and any kind of democratic power over of the most fundamental thing that affects their daily lives.   As far as the European Central Bank is concerned the removal of all democratic linkage between the citizen and the relevant decision making bodies is deliberate and absolute.  Article 7 of the statues of the ECB states:  "neither the ECB, nor a national bank, nor any member of their decision making bodies shall take or seek instructions from Community institutions or bodies, from any government of a member state or from any other body".   Let us imagine for a moment that Britain had joined the euro, and that at some time in the future an adverse economic situation arises with spiraling inflation, rising unemployment, and perhaps even civil disorder imminent.  A British government would have no control over the levers of economic power, and if it tried to make any representation to the Board of the European Central Bank to take measure on behalf of the British people it would be told that it would be illegal to even transmit its petition to the ECB.  The constitutional consequence of Britain deciding to join the euro would be that the British people accepted that their democratic system of government was giving up, permanently and irrevocably, power over one of the most vital areas of national life: and, that they were effectively surrendering democratic rule for a form of dictatorship.   It is the case already that EU laws are made by decree, and that EU law takes precedence over English & Scottish law. All the EU treaties (Rome, Single European Market, Masstricht, Amsterdam and Nice) were in effect a series of 'enabling acts'  whereby democratic government was replaced  by undemocratic government: this process is now almost complete.   If Britain joins the euro then she will have ceased to be, once and for all, a self-governing independent nation and she will have accepted the subservient status of a region of the European Union.

 

THE POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES

If Britain decides to join the euro then at some point in the future the electorate may well ask: is it really is still worthwhile turning out on a wet Thursday to cast a vote at all?   If politicians give up the right to exercise power over the currency and the economy then what are they good for?    Local Authority election turnouts in Britain are generally low, in the region of 20%-30%.  People are apathetic about electing officials who they see as not having very much real power.  Turnouts in the European parliamentary elections are even lower, a record low of around 25% being achieved in the 1999 election: not surprisingly since most people despise MEPs who are seen as clambering abroad a useless gravy train in order to disappear on five-year-long expense account lunches.  General elections still achieve a high turnout, in the 70% plus range because people still see Parliament as being relevant to their lives.  They think that their vote still counts and that they still have power to change the way in which they are governed.

 

However people are becoming more and more aware that the essential issues that effect their lives are increasingly moving out of the control of parliament and government and into the hands of the European Union.  The whole issue of Europe, more then any other, has caused a general increase in the mood of public cynicism towards politics.   If the British people decide to join the euro in a referendum then they have to do so with their eyes wide open.  They will soon find that they have no democratic influence or control of the most important economic areas of national life.  What then will be the point of voting for politicians who have no real or effective power? There won't even be any point in demonstrating on the streets - the disaffected will have to travel to Brussels or Frankfurt to make their point. 

 

 

NEXT                    CONTENTS